0

Closed

Allow synchronus processing

description

We need to stop waiting for threads to complete execution for error checking.  Although this works, it would probably slow execution on a large batch of files.  Maybe a try-catch statement would work?
Closed Jun 21, 2008 at 8:25 PM by pschorf
The final decision was to keep the current, asynchronous setup. I've decided to close this issue.

comments

pschorf wrote Jun 16, 2008 at 11:39 PM

It doesn't. I'm considering actually leaving the way it is, forcing threads to execute one at a time. I think this will have a reliability benefit, and prevent any conversions from breaking (unannounced) due to an error somewhere else in the program. Seeing as I know very little about threads anyway, this is probably a good idea. Let me know what you think.

wrote Jun 21, 2008 at 8:25 PM

wrote Jan 31, 2013 at 9:12 PM

wrote May 8, 2013 at 4:43 PM